Thursday, October 10, 2013

The Island of Population Regulation

Utopia, meh. The whole book felt like a medieval Ursula LeGuin novel to me. A seemingly perfect place that fails to pass closer inspection, Utopia has more negative than positive attributes. Perhaps I'm a selfish person, but between the utter lack of privacy and  constant focus on the common good, More could not pay me enough to move to his non-existent paradise.
Another element that just did not sit well with me was "Kinda' Exile Island" as well as other population control measures. Although we are assured that the Utopians are cool with being shipped off to an overflow colony for the good of all Utopia, it just doesn't seem right. After all, this is not a matter of being able to feed or provide for them - Utopia has a ton of excess food and supplies, but simply a comfort measure. What is not addressed is whether or not these colonists are afforded the same opportunities as the rest of society and the inherent unfairness of being relocated because of some arbitrary population quota. Maybe because the UK was already displacing unwanted populations to British Colonies in Australia and the Americas, this seemed like an acceptable outlet.
Additionally, what was with the redistribution of children as if they were resources? I get that children were helpful for work, but every Utopian works so I would think that would mitigate their value as workers somewhat. The assertion that the citizens were just fine taking one for the team and sending their "extra" children off to childless couples, is so absurd that I nearly lost my ability to "buy in" to the story. It's a good thing that Utopia is no place/good place and that Hythloday speaks nonsense!

3 comments:

  1. I too had a hard time "buying" into More's Utopia. It all seemed a bit to "hive" mentality, the "Greater Good." I picture the natives coming up to travelers and start chanting "One of us! One of us!" or for them to turn out to be weirdo lizard people or whatever...maybe I've read a bit too much sci-fi.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're opening line basically summed up my thoughts as well. "Meh." I thought I was really going to like this utopian city solely because the name suggested a city of greatness. However, as we discussed in class it left a lot to be desired. I was especially disappointed by the slaves. That part rubbed me the wrong way completely

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like you talked about, I had a lot of trouble with the part about the children. A utopian society is supposed to be equal (in my mind) and this is just another one of the inequalities we see. There's this, the fact that they have slaves, and sexism, and possibly more that I'm missing.

    ReplyDelete