When I started reading Book II of Utopia, I instantly thought
it was better than the first section that we read because it was much easier to
read and understand. Book I is very dull and boring, and I just found it
difficult to get through because it is so wordy. I felt like Thomas More was just
rambling a lot of the time, which makes it difficult to find the point he was
making. I found Book II easier to read because More was describing this so
called “perfect” world, and it wasn’t as hard to understand. At first, Utopia
sounded interesting to me—not in the “I would like to live there” way, but more
because it was a different take on what an ideal society would look like. But
as I read on I realized that it’s not as perfect as Thomas More makes it out to
be.
My cons list ended up being much, much longer than my pros
list. The first aspect that hit me that I didn’t like was the fact that in this
“perfect” society, there were still slaves. I know that during the 16th
century, slaves were a common thing, and were different from how we think of
them. That doesn’t stop me from thinking that a utopia should not have slaves,
because then this would not be a perfect world for everyone; only some. I also
didn’t like the same routine every single day, no privacy, and the fact that
everybody wore generally the same clothes. There is no individuality in this,
and to me it seems like this world would get very boring, very fast.
Thomas More’s version of Utopia feels like the world itself
is trying too hard to be perfect, if that makes any sense. Like someone just
thought “Hey, if we make everybody look the same and have the same job, then
there won’t be any problems in the world.” This reminds me of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 because in that world,
the government made books illegal and burned them all to prevent the people
from having individuality or having any opinions and beliefs of their own. To
the people in the book, other than Guy Montag and Clarisse, this was a perfect
world because there were no problems, and nobody argued or had a different
opinion, but it was really a dystopia. I feel like More’s Utopia is going to
eventually become a dystopia, because it is not, in fact, perfect.
No comments:
Post a Comment